article 3 months old

Rudi’s View: ABC Of Equities Recovery Rally

Always an independent thinker, Rudi has not shied away from making big out-of-consensus predictions that proved accurate later on. When Rio Tinto shares surged above $120 he wrote investors should sell. In mid-2008 he warned investors not to hold on to equities in oil producers. In August 2008 he predicted the largest sell-off in commodities stocks was about to follow. In 2009 he suggested Australian banks were an excellent buy. Between 2011 and 2015 Rudi consistently maintained investors were better off avoiding exposure to commodities and to commodities stocks. Post GFC, he dedicated his research to finding All-Weather Performers. See also "All-Weather Performers" on this website, as well as the Special Reports section.

Rudi's View | Jun 04 2020

This story features WOOLWORTHS GROUP LIMITED, and other companies. For more info SHARE ANALYSIS: WOW

Dear time-poor investor: if this week’s data insights don’t surprise you then I don’t know what will

In this week's Weekly Insights:

-ABC Of Equities Recovery Rally
-Banks Are Cheap, But…
-Rudi Talks
-No Weekly Insights Next Week

ABC Of Equities Recovery Rally

By Rudi Filapek-Vandyck, Editor FNArena

Investors are constantly plagued by questions for which there’s not always an easy and straightforward answer available.

How much exactly is the landscape for retail landlords changing? Is the trend towards less globalisation irreversible? What stocks and sectors are being impacted by riots in streets across the United States?

Probably the most important questions right now are, after such a strong recovery from beaten down index levels in March, how much upside is left in the short to medium term, and what is most likely to happen next?

Recent share market updates by analysts at Citi and Barclays, based on financial data insights provided by EPFR, will surprise most of you, but also provide some important clues.

Looking for Answers

Financial intelligence platform EPFR specialises in digging into global funds flows capturing both large institutions and retail investors.

EPFR data, but more so the insights derived from the data, are highly sought after by market analysts and strategists trying to decipher the global mood and latest movements.

Picture their surprise when the latest data update showed virtually nobody had been buying post the March 23 bottom in global equity markets.

Net funds flows into global equities have been on a sharp downtrend ever since the late 2018 conniptions, and calendar 2020 has simply continued that trend. Moreover, institutional investors including hedge funds kept on raising more cash as equities started rallying into April and May.

This raises two obvious questions:

-who has been buying in the past two months?

-what do these institutions intend to do with all that cash now equity markets have rallied so strongly?


Let’s tackle the first question first, as I am sure I now have your attention.

Declining funds flows while equities are rising is not as unusual as we all tend to think. Instinctively, it doesn’t make sense, but in practice equities can rally higher, and continue rallying higher, while more investors are withdrawing their money from equities.

It happened during the euro-crisis of 2011/12 and extended post-crisis further into 2013. It happened again in 2018/19.

Previously, buybacks from a growing number of US companies are believed to have made up the key difference.

This time around US companies have -for obvious reasons- stopped buying in their own shares.

So who has been buying instead?

Both Citi and Barclays point the finger at the same source: short sellers closing out their positions.

While in Australia there is anecdotal evidence the sell-off into March has attracted many fresh and returning retail investors, the EPFR data suggest no such retail participation revival has taken place in the USA.

Also, while the local ETF industry seems to have seen a boost of fresh inflows on the back of heightened market volatility, again, EPFR data reveal both active and passive money flows have declined so far this year globally.

It seems Australia has danced to its own tune post March 23. Australian indices still underperformed US benchmarks, and by quite the margin too.

After falling further than US share indices, the ASX200 had recovered by nearly 31% at the end of May with the S&P500 up 36% and the Nasdaq up 38% over the same period.

Also, the underlying trend towards passive investing very much remains intact. Over the last 12 months, investors moved -US$541bn out of active equity funds and US$327bn into passive alternatives.

The equally surprising, and important, observation from the EPFR-gathered insights is that in March investors globally shifted their money out of bonds, at the same time as they were selling equities.

Analysts at Citi go as far as to make the point that money flowing away from bonds is the most important narrative of March this year. Reaching a total net withdrawal of -US$445bn, outflows from bond funds in March is labelled “unprecedented”.

Luckily, Citi analysts note, central banks managed to stop the rout, with inflows returning in April. Notably, high yield bond funds recovered all their March outflows the next month.

EPFR data show money has kept flowing into US corporate bonds (“credit”) ever since the Federal Reserve declared themselves buyers into that particular market segment, though investors’ enthusiasm is not replicated in Europe or Emerging Markets (both clearly still seen as high risk).

The one positive remark to make is that, when placed in a larger context, this year’s net outflows from equities are not super-sized. As pointed out by Citi, since February there have been -US$120bn in redemptions whereas December 2018 alone saw redemptions amount to -US$105bn.

The added background here is that net outflows post late 2018 have only gone south ever since.


So, less investors are keeping their money with equities, but less traditional market participants such as the listed corporations themselves and short sellers pulling up stumps after making stellar profits are keeping this bull market for equities going for longer.

It’s hardly surprising this bull market for equities is constantly referred to as the most hated in history.

Not that investors who kept their money in the market, or those who have been buying freshly after March 23 will feel a need to complain.

All this does beg the question: what does it mean for the outlook of equity markets? Those short sellers that have been buying over the past two months are now done.

But equity prices are by now a lot higher too, and average cash levels are bloated.


Year-to-date, the largest beneficiaries of global funds flows are US corporate credit, US government bonds and cash and equivalents. According to the data, mutual funds in the US are sitting on their highest cash levels on record.

In addition, note analysts at Barclays, market positioning for these mutual funds, and for many an institutional investor across the world, is still very defensive.

The combination of both should translate into limited downside risk for equity markets, Barclays suggests.

But, but, but!

While it is easy to conclude the April-May rally in local and global equity markets, led by short sellers and daring retail investors, will soon force the hand of cautious institutions, pushing equity markets a lot higher, strategists at European powerhouse Amundi are not so convinced.

Amundi remains of the view that risk remains very well alive for risk assets, suggesting investors start making small allocations to market laggards and cyclicals, but with a conservative and cautious bias overall.

The Paris-headquartered asset manager distinguishes three key areas that may well deliver the next major disappointment for current “risk ignorant” equity markets:

-the covid-19 pandemic; markets have casually adopted the view the worst is behind us and there will not be a second or third wave. Plus, we’ll have one of several vaccines available in the next few months;

-the economic recovery; investors are willing to price in positive scenarios on the back of huge fiscal and monetary support measures;

-the credit cycle; on Amundi’s assessment, credit markets have priced in a first round of defaults, but not a second follow-up for traditionally laggard assets. Plus, the battle between liquidity and solvency is as yet far from decided. Amundi is closely monitoring US commercial real estate.

Amundi’s view is probably best described as “tell them they’re dreaming”. The advice to investors is thus not to chase current momentum, but instead to gradually and selectively play investment themes better positioned towards a slow road to recovery.

Other risks to consider for investors include rising tensions between China and the US, the uncertain outcome of the approaching US presidential election, idiosyncratic risks in emerging markets (such as Brazil) and longer-term consequences from this year’s pandemic (many not yet quantified).


Amundi’s conviction call that investors should stay vigilant and cautious is being complemented by Citi’s Panic/Euphoria indicator now warning market sentiment has moved back into a state of euphoria.

History suggests pull backs will occur next, even though the exact timing remains unknown.

Investors should note a number of technical analysts and trading systems would back up the signal provided by Citi’s indicator.

For example, Lance Roberts from US based Real Investment Advice, reported on the weekend every single short-term momentum indicator he watches for US shares is currently signaling overbought conditions.

But this need not spell another period of disaster and mayhem ahead.

From the start of what seemed at that time the arrival of an ugly bear market in February, I have stated the path and duration of whatever lays ahead shall be determined by future news flow.

Over the past two months the news flow has been predominantly positive, if we dismiss the humanitarian side of this crisis, and this has subsequently facilitated a surprisingly positive outcome for equity markets.

It is well possible that truly negative news and surprises may not announce themselves until much later, which leaves cashed-up institutions in a rather uncomfortable position.

What to do? And when?

As shown last week when shares in major Aussie banks suddenly caught a brief tsunami of buying orders, that cash on the sidelines is most likely attracted to momentum laggards and cheaper-priced cyclicals when it does decide to move into risk assets.

I also note share prices for quality safe havens such as Woolworths ((WOW)), Coles ((COL)) and CSL ((CSL)) have come under pressure while gains of 50% and more could be quickly had near the bottom of the domestic market.

It’ll be interesting to watch how, when and how many times market momentum switches between prior performers (Tech & Growth + Quality) and the value side of the share market.

Overall, one senses that with so much cash on the side, buying into dips might well have become the standard approach for many an institutional investor. This, by definition, limits the downside risk, at least for the time being.

For investors who hold many of the quality and growth stocks in portfolio, the key danger is that a sudden improvement in the economic outlook can spark a fierce return of money flowing into banks, resources stocks and other cyclicals similar to the switch that characterised the final quarter of 2016.

The threat for such a sharp transition in market momentum is further exacerbated by the historically wider-than-usual gap between Winners and Laggards.

Some level of catch-up seems but logical, if not necessary. Last week’s universal rally in banks, and the persistent lack of buyers’ interest in stocks I mentioned, are likely part of this process.

Meanwhile, share markets will continue asking questions of investors, including what risks are you most afraid of, and which stocks are best suited for your portfolio and strategy?

Depending on one’s personal objectives, horizon and investment strategy, the answers given in response to such questions might look a lot different between market participants.

Banks Are Cheap, But…

Are Australian banks worth chasing?

The question looks a lot different today than at the beginning of last week when share prices for major banks started flying by double digit percentages.

Analysts at Macquarie have been surprised by how quickly and fiercely the upward correction in beaten down bank share prices came out of nowhere.

They are also of the view that bank share prices remain “cheap” on a relative basis vis-à-vis the broader market to the tune of 10-20%.

But they would not chase further market momentum from here onwards. The prime reason is that Macquarie sector analysts can see plenty of reasons as to why banks will, and likely should, remain at a sizeable relative undervaluation.

Think low or even negative interest rates and bond yields. Add elevated impairment charges and higher costs still in the aftermath of the Royal Commission.

Macquarie argues a quick V-shaped economic recovery would likely not be to the banks’ benefit as they’d find themselves fighting off increased competition.

For updated price targets: see Stock Analysis on the website.

Rudi Talks

I have been scheduled in for appearances on Spotee with Elio D’Amato on TickerTV on:

-Wednesday June 17, 12.30pm

-Wednesday July 15, 12pm

Plus I continue making weekly appearances on The Call with David Koch, on AusbizTV, every Thursday, noon-1pm; and a brief call-in around 11am every Friday.

No Weekly Insights Next Week

Australia celebrates the Queen's birthday next week Monday and Weekly Insights will skip the week and return the week after.

(This story was written on Monday 1st June, 2020. It was published on the day in the form of an email to paying subscribers, and again on Thursday as a story on the website).

(Do note that, in line with all my analyses, appearances and presentations, all of the above names and calculations are provided for educational purposes only. Investors should always consult with their licensed investment advisor first, before making any decisions. All views are mine and not by association FNArena's – see disclaimer on the website.

In addition, since FNArena runs a Model Portfolio based upon my research on All-Weather Performers it is more than likely that stocks mentioned are included in this Model Portfolio. For all questions about this: or via the direct messaging system on the website).



Paid subscribers to FNArena (6 and 12 mnths) receive several bonus publications, at no extra cost, including:

– The AUD and the Australian Share Market (which stocks benefit from a weaker AUD, and which ones don't?)
– Make Risk Your Friend. Finding All-Weather Performers, January 2013 (The rationale behind investing in stocks that perform irrespective of the overall investment climate)
– Make Risk Your Friend. Finding All-Weather Performers, December 2014 (The follow-up that accounts for an ever changing world and updated stock selection)
– Change. Investing in a Low Growth World. eBook that sells through Amazon and other channels. Tackles the main issues impacting on investment strategies today and the world of tomorrow.
– Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Bear? eBook and Book (print) available through Amazon and other channels. Your chance to relive 2016, and become a wiser investor along the way.

Subscriptions cost $440 (incl GST) for twelve months or $245 for six and can be purchased here (depending on your status, a subscription to FNArena might be tax deductible):

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Click to view our Glossary of Financial Terms