Why Powell’s ‘Soft Landing’ Is Impossible

International | Jun 20 2022

Richard (Rick) Mills
Ahead of the Herd

As a general rule, the most successful man in life is the man who has the best information.

In economics parlance, the term “soft landing” refers to a cyclical slowdown in economic growth that avoids recession. The central bank typically aims for a “soft landing” when it seeks to raise interest rates just enough to stop an economy from overheating and experiencing high inflation, while avoiding a severe downturn.

On multiple occasions in the past, the US Federal Reserve has sought to engineer a “soft landing” during the inflationary periods, which, on paper, is difficult but not entirely achievable (see: 1994-1995). In 2022, a year in which the US economy is experiencing its highest inflation in four decades, the Fed is prepared to embark on that challenge once again.

However, many, including Fed Chair Jerome Powell, have admitted that a “soft landing” this time could be an overachievement. As we’ve seen in the past, Fed’s attempts to bring about a “soft landing” are usually complicated by the lags associated with monetary policy, as former Fed chair Ben Bernanke and many others have noted.

In dismissing another vehicular analogy, former Fed chair Ben Bernanke once said that “if making monetary policy is like driving a car, then the car is one that has an unreliable speedometer, a foggy windshield, and a tendency to respond unpredictably and with a delay to the accelerator or the brake.” Nothing that’s happened since has made the Fed’s job look any easier.

In a recent interview with Marketplace, Powell admitted that “a soft landing is really just getting back to 2% inflation while keeping the labor market strong. And it’s quite challenging to accomplish that right now.” Nonetheless, he went on to say “we think there are pathways … for us to get there.”

Whether Powell can actually pull off an economic “soft landing” remains to be seen, but as things stand, we believe there are enough reasons to be skeptical.

Poor Track Record

The Fed’s “soft landing” record is, at best, mixed because the central bank doesn’t exercise nearly the same control over the course of the economy as a pilot has over aircraft.

The latest and most lauded “soft landing” success was achieved in 1994-95, during the tenure of former Fed chair Alan Greenspan, who raised the benchmark rate from 3% to 6% as the economy was rebounding after a brief recession.

Current chair Jerome Powell also pointed to successful “soft landings” in 1965 and 1984, and believed the US economy was on course for another one in 2020 before the Covid-19 pandemic intervened.

Still, historically speaking, “soft landings” are probably the rarest of economic feats given the number of times that the Fed tried and failed to balance inflation with economic growth.

Recent research from Alan Blinder, a former Federal Reserve board vice-chairman and a Princeton economist, identified 11 tightening cycles since 1965, of which eight were followed by recessions. In the last five instances when inflation peaked above 5% (1970, 1974, 1980, 1990 and 2008), a recession followed.

Because of the Fed’s history with “soft landings”, there are growing fears that the Fed could once again inadvertently send the economy into a recession as it takes a more aggressive approach to fight inflation, which is at the highest level since 1981.

Weak Economic Data

Not helping Powell’s cause are the red flags raised by the latest set of economic data, which are fueling the concerns of economic growth and the potential for policy missteps.

While the April employment report showed another month of solid job growth in America, with the unemployment rate also staying level at 3.6%, the labor participation and employment rates remained stagnant, as they have been over the past year. In fact, the US labor force shrank unexpectedly last month as an increased number of workers decided to stay on the sidelines.

When announcing the latest interest rate hike, Powell cited the number of job openings relative to the labor supply as a reason that policymakers had become more aggressive in recent months. “You can see that the labor market is out of balance: You can see that there is a labor shortage,” Powell said.

The consequence of a shrinking labor force is an inevitable fall in economic performance indicators. US manufacturing activity during April grew at its slowest pace in nearly two years.

More surprising is a drastic contraction in the New York Fed’s Empire State index on manufacturing activity,  which tumbled 36.2 points to -11.6 in May (against an expectation of +15). This reading was lower than even the worst-case forecast from analysts (-10).

According to the Institute for Supply Management’s latest survey, outbreaks overseas are also “creating a near-term headwind for the US manufacturing community.”

The ISM index of national factory activity fell to a reading of 55.4 last month, the lowest since July 2020, from 57.1 in March. A reading above 50 indicates expansion in manufacturing, which accounts for 12% of the US economy.

The ISM survey’s forward-looking new orders subindex also dipped.

Bear Market Territory

Chances of a “soft landing” are even slimmer when we factor in the state of global equity markets, which have been dragged down for months by the stubborn inflation and slow growth.

The performance of stock indices like the S&P 500, which is down 16% this year, paints a picture of how high of a mountain we have to climb to avoid a recession. And the bleeding is likely going to continue, according to the major banks, with investors bracing for an inevitable bear market and piling into cash, commodities, health care and consumer staples.

A recent report from Bank of America showed that cash levels among investors hit the highest level since September 2001, which the bank describes as “extremely bearish”.

Morgan Stanley’s chief US equity strategist and CIO Michael Wilson recently said that stocks still have further to fall before hitting their bear market bottom. “We remain confident that lower prices are still ahead,” Wilson wrote in a note.

After seeing the S&P 500 posting its sixth straight weekly loss for the first time since 2011, Wilson asserted this week that the “risk of a recession has gone up materially,” and the bank’s bear case now assumes the US to fall into a recession by 2023 due to “sticky” inflationary pressures, sustained margin declines, and a broad deceleration in sales growth.

Back in November, Morgan Stanley had already predicted a 20% drop in the S&P  in its 2022 outlook report. But now,  it sees valuations falling even further before the current stock market pain subsides.

Echoing those views are Deutsche Bank, which is predicting a “major” recession in the US by next year, and former Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who argued that the current recession risk is “very, very high” in a CBS interview.

Remember, every time inflation has exceeded 4% and unemployment has been below 5%, the US economy has gone into a recession.

Supply Chain Shocks

Should a major recession be somehow avoided, the success of the Fed’s “soft landing” efforts will ultimately be judged by how it keeps the hottest inflation in over 40 years under control.

However, with the ongoing supply chain disruptions happening worldwide, accomplishing that feat looks increasingly difficult each day. This is especially true for a mammoth economy like the US, which is more exposed to supply shocks than most others, and so the inflationary pressures are much higher and irreversible.

Exacerbating this inflation is the pressure by American companies to raise wages to address the current worker shortage. Wages are, in general, the best measure of core inflation, accounting for two-thirds of business costs. The end result would be even higher prices being passed onto consumers from the labor costs, creating a vicious cycle of inflation.

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that while wages continued to grow in April 2022 at a rate of 0.3%, the real wages actually decreased, as inflation completely overshadowed the nominal wage increase. Real average hourly earnings decreased 2.6%, seasonally adjusted, from the same period last year.

Government Spending

The last factor we cannot ignore is the US government’s reluctance to cut fiscal spending to revitalize its economy. Fundamentally, inflation is the result of having “too much money to buy too few goods,” and federal spending is essentially printing more money and driving up prices of goods.

This is worrisome considering the US is already coming off a fiscal year during which it made a $6.8 trillion outlay that resulted in a budget deficit of nearly $2.8 trillion, or 2.4% of its GDP, the second-largest percentage of GDP since 1945. Another $6 trillion in spending is earmarked by the Biden Administration this year, potentially another $1.8 trillion to its national debt.

At this rate of fiscal spending, US core inflation will most likely be kept elevated, as GDP growth is expected to remain flat amid a tighter financial outlook. Goldman Sachs recently lowered its forecast for US economic growth again in 2022 to reflect the current economic conditions and the Fed’s aggressive rate hike plans.

Richard (Rick) Mills

rick@aheadoftheherd.com

Richard is the owner of Aheadoftheherd.com and invests in the junior resource/bio-tech sectors. His articles have been published on over 400 websites, including:

WallStreetJournal, USAToday, NationalPost, Lewrockwell, MontrealGazette, VancouverSun, CBSnews, HuffingtonPost, Londonthenews, Wealthwire, CalgaryHerald, Forbes, Dallasnews, SGTReport, Vantagewire, Indiatimes, ninemsn, ibtimes and the Association of Mining Analysts.

If you're interested in learning more about the junior resource and bio-med sectors, and quality individual company’s within these sectors, please come and visit us at www.aheadoftheherd.com

Content included in this article is not by association necessarily the view of FNArena (see our disclaimer). This story was originally published on May 19, 2022. It has been re-published with permission of the publisher.

Legal Notice / Disclaimer

This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment.

Richard Mills has based this document on information obtained from sources he believes to be reliable but which has not been independently verified.

Richard Mills makes no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion are those of Richard Mills only and are subject to change without notice. Richard Mills assumes no warranty, liability or guarantee for the current relevance, correctness or completeness of any information provided within this Report and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission.

Furthermore, I, Richard Mills, assume no liability for any direct or indirect loss or damage or, in particular, for lost profit, which you may incur as a result of the use and existence of the information provided within this Report.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see graphs included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" – Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

FNArena is proud about its track record and past achievements: Ten Years On

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Click to view our Glossary of Financial Terms