Stock Outcomes Hinge On The President

FYI | Sep 10 2019

By Peter Switzer, Switzer Super Report

Stock outcomes hinge on this current P.O.T.U.S.

A subscriber emailed me recently pondering the value of being led astray by a Trump tweet. He even suggested that the US President is guilty of breaking stock exchange laws. It got me thinking about the positive or negative impact on our wealth building since November 2016, when Donald J. Trump became this very unusual President of the United States of America.

This is what the email put forward: "Have you ever considered that the one thing well established is that Trump lies a lot. It has pretty well been established that the phone call supposedly from the Chinese seeking a solution, which he talked about at the end of the G7 meeting, never happened. Undoubtedly, he is in breach of market manipulation laws and opens himself up to class actions from investors who suffer losses as a result of relying on his tweets. I do not know if it is a good idea for the media to give credibility to statements emanating from him or his cronies. What do you think?"

It's a thoughtful question. Answering it has to bring a wide-ranging analysis, which might also help us decide if we should invest/gamble on what the President and his team say or tweet.

Right now, the President and his economic advisor, Larry Kudlow, are trying to portray the October trade meeting in Washington as negotiations at a "higher level" and Chinese communiques on the same subject have been more conciliatory than others we have seen since May, when the public messaging was reduced to trade trash talk.

The market always reacts negatively to bad trade deal news and vice versa, making it believable that a trade truce would send stocks surging higher.

As I've said before, Professor Jeremy Siegel of the Wharton School at the Uni of Pennsylvania thinks a 20% spike isn't out of the question. If he's right, it has to be keeping a lot of us fully invested on the basis you wouldn't want to miss out on any trade truce leg up for Wall Street, which would carry over to our All Ords.

Of course, the flipside is that if the tariff escalation tit-for-tat show continues between the US and China, then we could see a 20% collapse of stocks. I think the slide could even be bigger because the global economy is struggling with recession threats and a Wall Street crash would be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

Trump and Kudlow know this and could be angling for a short-term solution that will appease market fears. On Friday, Kudlow, who over the past week has been saying stuff to make us think that a deal is a chance if the October talks go well, told us that this horse-trading could go on for years because there are so many Chinese wrongs on trade that need to be righted.

I don't have a psychology degree, so working out Donald's agenda and negotiating style is guesswork. But I remain convinced that he'd prefer a deal leading to a stock market spike across the usual strong time for shares (November to April) before rolling into the second-half for 2020 and the November election.

Since Donald assumed power, there has been a 28% increase in the US S&P 500 and the Australian market has also followed suit (see chart below). And even the trade war over the past 18 months hasn't stopped stocks rising.

And this chart of our GDP growth shows the local economy hasn't been a big help for the stock market.

And the usual mainstays — the banks — have not been the usual power drivers of the S&P/ASX 200 Index. The Royal Commission and APRA's impositions have taken the wind out of the banks' share price sails so the lead from Wall Street has consistently been a key influencer. Over the Trump era, CBA has gone from $76 to $79.


Over the same time, another big market driver, BHP, has gone from $25 to $33, before the dam collapse at Vale's mine pushed the share price to $41. The Trump era didn't impede iron ore's price, helping to add 44% to the big miner's share price.

Trump tweets are market impactful, with a paper from The University of Nottingham showing "that a tweet by Trump leads to statistically significant abnormal returns that last for 2 to 3 trading days…[and] Trump's tweets lead to an abnormal trade volume of 43.54% on the day of the tweet and an increase in Google search activity on the week of the tweet."

The full story is for FNArena subscribers only. To read the full story plus enjoy a free two-week trial to our service SIGN UP HERE

If you already had your free trial, why not join as a paying subscriber? CLICK HERE